Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wants airline passengers to improve their manners and their attire. His campaign is called “The Golden Age of Travel Starts with You.” Tampa airport agrees. They want a ban on passengers wearing pajamas.
— Tampa International Airport ✈️ (@FlyTPA) February 26, 2026
People aren’t sure if this is real. Some folks don’t like a government entity trolling the way a person or company might (“It’s funny when Wendy’s has a troll account. Less funny when a taxpayer funded agency does it” – though the airport is broadly airline and passenger-funded, but it does receive taxpayer grants). .
Delta flies to Amsterdam from Tampa. British Airways flies to London Gatwick and Virgin Atlantic has London Heathrow.. Lufthansa’s DIscover flies to Frankfurt and Edelweiss serves Zurich. Presumably putting on pajamas once on the aircraft would be acceptable.
I bring a pair of airline pajamas (the same airline when possible, but at least the same airline group or a joint venture partner when absolutely necessary) and I’ll change into the when still on the ground at the start of an overnight transoceanic flight.
In terms of actually imposing restrictions on dress, what’s important to understand is:
An airport can have rules on expression, including clothing, that are tied to safety and operations, content-neutral, clear and applied evenly. There’s likely no problem with a rule against nudity in the airport, though this is also usually going to be redundant with state law so not even needed. There can also be requirements to wear shoes! That’s a safety and sanitation issue.
But anything that discriminates against a particular viewpoint is usually not going to pass scrutiny. And content-based “civility” rules are going to be tough in a public airport, though an airline can do it in their space within the airport. An airport can’t ban offensive language t-shirts, but an airline can (Cohen v. California is the classic case on government clothing restrictions dealing with a specific viewpoint.)
Airports can offer vague rules. Those lean into discretion, and lead to selective enforcement. That ends up as viewpoint discrimination. Ban pajamas has to answer what even counts as pajamas. You don’ thave to get to viewpoint here to have a problem with vagueness. What about onesies or hospital scrubs? What about if young kids are wearing their pajamas onto a long haul flight, or before a 5 a.m. departure? We quickly get into discretionary enforcement which is a problem.
In Florida you’ve also got their Religious Freedom Restoration Act which bans government entities from burdening a person’s religious exercise, including attire, without a compelling state interest and demonstration that doing so is the least restrictive means of accomplishing that objective. That makes it tough for airports to ban head coverings, for instance.
Airlines, restaurants bars and other private businesses operating in an airport can have their own rules like “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Dice.” And in fact, airlines put this into their contracts of carriage.
- American Airlines: passengers must “dress appropriately; bare feet or offensive clothing aren’t allowed.”
- Delta: may refuse transport when a passenger’s “conduct, attire, hygiene or odor creates an unreasonable risk of offense or annoyance to other passengers.”
- United: can refuse passengers who are “barefoot, not properly clothed, or whose clothing is lewd, obscene or offensive.”
- Southwest bans “offensive behavior,” including wearing clothes that are “lewd, obscene, or patently offensive.”
Tampa’s airport isn’t actually going to ban wearing pajamas. And I think there are times where pajamas are fine and certainly far better than what many people wear!
Tampa isn’t really going to police pajamas—but this viral stunt perfectly captures the absurdity of trying to regulate passenger attire, and probably wouldn’t even withstand judicial scrutiny if they tried.
More From View from the Wing
Link da fonte
